We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this

We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously.- French philosopher Félix GuattariWhat type of fallacy is this and why?