Argument from reciprocal obligations, found in crito 50c-53a

1. What are the explicit premises of this argument?

2. What is the conclusion of this argument?

3. What are the implicit premises of this argument? Remember that these are the assumptions implied in the argument which are not explicitly stated.

4. How can you make the implicit premises more explicit?

5. Are there any weaknesses you can identify in this argument? Explain.